Scriptwriters have long used books as the basis for movies
and TV shows. I suppose good ideas are hard to come by in Hollywood, so why not
poach someone else’s blood, sweat and tears, right? And who among us hasn’t
daydreamed about our book being turned into a film or Netflix series? To be
honest, there are only about a dozen original plots in the world anyway, and
they’ve all been used.
I became a classic film buff when I was a kid and if the
movie was based on a book, I’d usually read it afterward. Imagine my surprise
when I discovered that in many cases, the two bore little resemblance to each
other! The changes were often minor, usually because the book was long or
contained mature content, but it made me curious as to how often that happened,
and what alterations were made.
“Double Indemnity” was a bestselling novel by James M.
Cain, a cynical tale of greed and murder fueled by extra-marital lust.
Naturally, there had to be a movie version to cash in on its popularity. The
screenwriters apparently thought Cain hadn’t done his job correctly, because
they re-arranged pieces of the plot into a different order. The result was a
classic film noir that still holds up today. Even Cain grudgingly admitted that
Billy Wilder and Raymond Chandler did an okay job with their adaptation.
Speaking of Chandler, his breakthrough murder mystery
“The Big Sleep” had Hollywood blockbuster stamped all over it. It was the
second on-screen pairing of Humphrey Bogart and Lauren Bacall, and Bogart forged
the template for every tough private eye that followed. It’s an entertaining film
but unfortunately, the plot is so confusing that you get to the end without knowing
who did it, or why. At one point, the writers even consulted Chandler for an
answer, but he said he wasn’t sure, either. His lack of interest could be
because he wasn’t asked to adapt his own novel, and probably didn’t care.
A lot of Ernest Hemingway’s stories made it to the
screen, with mixed results. He claimed not to have liked most of them, with two
exceptions. The first fifteen minutes of “The Killers” pretty much copied his short
story word for word. When the plot veered into uncovering the motive for the murder,
Hemingway stopped watching. He also enjoyed “For Whom the Bell Tolls” because
it starred Gary Cooper, whom Hemingway had envisioned when he wrote the book.
He had reservations about another adaptation, “To Have
and Have Not.” Hemingway felt that it was the worst book he ever wrote and bet
filmmaker Howard Hawks that he couldn’t make a decent movie out of it. He was
proved wrong. Of course, the writers only kept the title and basically made it
into a carbon copy of “Casablanca,” but who cared? It also helped that it was
the first on-screen teaming of Bogart and Bacall (in her film debut), and the
heat between the two radiated from the screen. They were married shortly after
the film was completed.
There have been some adaptations that closely followed
the original source. The first few James Bond films stayed true to Ian
Fleming’s novels, especially “From Russia with Love.” “The Hound of the
Baskervilles” with Basil Rathbone as Sherlock Holmes is very close to Arthur
Conan Doyle’s adventure. “The Godfather” is another example, because Mario Puzo
co-wrote the screenplay and was protective of his story. “The Maltese Falcon”
is faithful to Dashiell Hammett’s book because screenwriter John Huston lifted
scenes and dialogue directly from it.
Several of Donald E. Westlake’s crime capers were
turned into entertaining movies, particularly “The Hot Rock,” “The Organization,”
and “The Split.” When he sold the rights to any of his stories featuring a
career criminal named Parker, however, he refused to let the producers use the
name Parker unless they bought the entire series, which no one was willing to
do. His Parker story “The Hunter” has been filmed twice, as “Point Blank” (with
Lee Marvin playing Walker), and “Payback” (with Mel Gibson as Porter). Most of
Westlake’s film adaptations retained the personality and nuances of his
characters.
Elmore Leonard didn’t fare too well in the
true-to-the-source department. While I enjoyed “Get Shorty,” I looked for
comparisons to the book but couldn’t find very many. I noticed the same thing
with some of Mickey Spillane’s filmed adventures. “Kiss Me Deadly” is a
terrific movie, but many of the book’s characters appeared in name only. Nelson
DeMille’s “The General’s Daughter” was hard to put down once I began reading
it, but I didn’t have that problem with the film version. Robert
B. Parker did better with his Spenser series because he maintained creative
control.
Perhaps the low point in book-to-screen adaptations was
“The Green Berets” (1967), with John Wayne. Robin Moore’s novel was a factual,
non-political story about the elite military unit fighting in Viet Nam. What
emerged onscreen was a piece of propaganda designed to sell the public on
Wayne’s firm belief that the war was actually good for America. Maybe he
thought he was still making those WWII movies where he single-handedly defeated
the Axis of Evil.
Pass the popcorn!
Tim Smith is an award-winning, bestselling author of
romantic mystery/thrillers and contemporary erotic romance. His website is TimSmithAllAuthor.com
2 comments:
I hear you about the books being better than the screen adaptations. I loved King's The Shining. OMG, Kubrick screwed that one up big time. The film was unwatchable.
I will say Ordinary People (Judith Guest) wasn't as good as the film version.
The Swedish versions of the Millennium trilogy (The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo; The Girl Who Played With Fire; The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet's Nest) are awesome! I recommend them highly. The US version of The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo w/Daniel Craig and Rooney Mara wasn't nearly as good as the Swedish version. No surprise. I've found foreign films to be far superior to Hollywood ones.
Thank you, Tina. I agree that the film can be better than the book, especially with the right cast and good direction.
Post a Comment