I
recently took several pages from my work in process to a critique meeting. They
I
liked the scene, which had lots of dialogue and showed the characters moving
and interacting in the sheriff’s office of a western town. It was more of a
transitional scene between two scenes with lots of tension and drama.
For
the most part everyone liked the writing, but one member said that for him it
fell flat and didn’t seem to have the energy my stuff usually has. He couldn’t put his finger on the problem,
but I trusted his instincts. We talked
it out and we realized I had missed one of the key reasons we write dialogue—to
move the story forward.
Every
bit of dialogue we write should be used to show character, mood, tension,
conflict and growth. It needs to
contribute to the story through the characters, through back story or
pacing. My scene didn’t make anyone
laugh or cry or scream. It didn’t raise any new questions and the only reason
anyone would be turning pages would be to skip ahead.
I
can usually find mistakes like this in other people’s work, but sometimes I
just can’t see the forest for the trees.

10 comments:
Good advice you received, Kathy. A long time ago I read that if you can chop a part of your story out and it doesn't change the plot/emotional build/whatever in the least, then it shouldn't have been in there to begin with. :)
Hi Tina,
I try not to get attached to what I write and I know these things, but I still forget. So I'm glad I have my critique group to keep me on track.
Excellent post. I recently screwed up almost a whole book by forgetting about POV. I got so intent on the plot. My editor had a fit. I couldn't believe when she pointed it out, but of course she was right.
A good reminder. In this age where everything needs to come faster, faster, faster! there really isn't any time for the kind of easy prose we want to draw from real life. Yes, in real life, we'd have all the pleasantries and waste the half hour--but for a reader, it's not always necessary. I'm guilty, too!
Hi Jean,
I mess up POV too. I have a tendency to drift into omniscent POV and tell the story with a wide angle camera lens. Hopefully the more I write and study craft, the better I'll get at spotting mistakes like this in rewrites.
Hi Barbara,
Great to see you here. Thanks for stopping by. If I wrote literary fiction I might be able to get away with more real-life prose, but I'm the same way when I read. I don't have time for the slow stuff and skip ahead to the "good-stuff." I guess that good stuff is what I need to get better at identifying as I write.
Kathy,
Great post. I actually don't have a lot of trouble with dialogue, but POV gave me fits and sometimes still does. I am like you about wanting to slip into the omniscient POV and tell it like that--I really do have to watch it.
Cheryl
Hi Cheryl,
The nice thing about writing is that nothing is carved in stone. I think it was James Michner who said, "I'm a terrible writer, but a great rewriter." At least we all can fix our mistakes. And I think your dilogue is great!
Yes, I also slip into narrative a great deal. The problem is that I can't tell in my own writing that I have done so. Finding a critique partner was the best thing I've done.
Hi Stormie,
Well, omniscent is a POV, it's just not used in romance much. It is hard though sometimes to keep it all straight when the words just want to come. Glad you have a good critique partner.
Post a Comment